Bible Translation Issue #1: Origins & Impact of the “King James Bible Onlyism” Heresy / Christian Answers

7 Responses to Bible Translation Issue #1: Origins & Impact of the “King James Bible Onlyism” Heresy / Christian Answers

1. Anthony Dente says:

   November 17, 2011 at 1:53 PM

   Hi:

   Just could not understand where Doug Kutilek gets is theology from.
   His comments on the Adventists are all wrong.
   He states:
   1. The Adventists teach of no conscienceness after one dies. That`s also what the bible teaches!
   2. The Adventists are saved by the works of the law. Wrong! Adventists are saved by faith in Jesus.
   3. Ellen G. White is on same level as Moses and Jeremiah! She admits herself being the lesser light to the greater light, the bible.
   4. Sunday worshipers receive mark of the beast. Not true. In fact everything Doug mentions about the Adventist church is wrong.

   Anthony

   Reply
2. Anthony Dente says:

   November 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM

   Hi:

   Further more, Doug uses Acts 13:42 to show how Wilkinson deceives by using the TR, So when the Jews went out of the synagogue… compared with the NU, … when they went out… Doug tries to explain Wilkinson`s use of the TR to establish the sabbath, since Jews were at the service. Doug wants no sabbath (saturday) in his bible!
   Along with point one, being conscience after death, Doug is going along with Catholic doctrines! Why does he say he is a baptist?

   Anthony

   Reply
3. Anthony Dente says:

   November 17, 2011 at 2:23 PM

   Hi:

   That`s conscious after death!
   Anthony

   Reply
4. Anthony Dente says:

   November 17, 2011 at 5:02 PM

   Hi:

   Ellen G. White, for those who do not know, is what Adventists consider a prophet. She has written 50 plus books including the Great Controversey and The Desire of Ages. She had only a third grade education! Doug points out she is a false prophet with no evidence. Had he read any of her books or is just rambling what others have said!
   Anthony

   Reply
5. Anthony Dente says:

   November 17, 2011 at 5:13 PM

   Hi:

   It seems, after viewing this clip, Doug uses the word “cult” a lot to describe Adventists.
   I guess cult means to Doug following the bible only and not traditions of men!

   Anthony

   Reply
6. Anthony Dente says:

   November 18, 2011 at 10:54 AM

   Conclusion?

   From my personal study of the manuscripts of the New Testament, which took over twenty years, I discovered two main streams, one the Textus Receptus and family and the other the Alexandrian and family.
   To make this simple, the Textus Receptus manuscripts were the back bone of the Protestant Reformation. The Alexandrian manuscripts were used to fight the reformation or counter it.
   Westcott and Hort, who were largely responsible for the Critical Text or bibles using the Alexandrian Text. Westcott and Hort did not like the TR., calling it a “vile serpent”!
   So in this light, these men who hated the TR, is proof manuscripts differ significantly!
   Bibles that follow Textus Receptus are the KJV and NKJV.
   Bibles that follow the Alexandrian Texts are the NIV, NASB, NEB, RSV etc.

   Anthony

   Reply
   • Anthony Dente says:

     November 18, 2011 at 1:11 PM

     The NKJV does have a partial base on the Nestle Text, also part of the Westcott and Hort Text of 1881.

     Reply